Home Home Home IGNOU Home Suggestions Suggestions Sitemap Sitemap Contact Us Contact Us

TEST II

ENGLISH LANGUAGE

Directions : For Q. Nos. 31 to 45. Given below are two passages (I and II) followed by the questions based on the contents of the passages. Answer the questions based on the contents of the passage.

PASSAGE 1

         The headlines proclaimed billions of dollars of debt relief for the world’s poorest countries as a result of the decisions taken by the major industrial countries at their annual G-7 summit, held in Cologne. But as the saying goes, the devil is in the detail. And closer examination of the debt write-off plan reveals a yawning gap between rhetoric and reality. The G-7 has proposed to reduce the debt of the poorest nations by $27 billion. But critics point out that much of the debt written off was not being serviced in any case. Even with the latest relief, poor countries will still be paying more interest and other payments to the banks and global financial institutions than they spend on education and health. Experience shows that extreme caution should be exercised when considering official pronouncements on debt relief plans. Three years ago the so-called Highly Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) debt reduction initiative was greeted with similar headlines. World Bank president James Wolfensohn hailed it as a “breakthrough”. US Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin said debt would be reduced to “manageable levels” and poor countries would be placed “on a sound footing for future development and growth”. Even the aid agency, Oxfam called it a “real opportunity to bring down the curtain on the debt crisis”. But the HIPC plan left the poorest nations deeper in debt and more tightly entrapped in the coils of the international financial system. This year, four million children under the age of five in the 41 nations classified as HIPCs will die as a result of preventable diseases, mainly due to lack of clean water and sanitation. Around 50 million children of primary school age are not in school, two-thirds of them girls. After carrying out stringent International Monetary Fund (IMF) restructuring measures, based on cutting government spending and opening up its economy to the operations of the “free market”, Mozambique, one of the poorest nations in the world, qualified for debt relief under the HIPC programme. It cut just $10 million from its debt burden and will still spend $80 million a year on debt — more than twice the national budget for primary education and four times the budget for primary health.


         The HIPC countries are concentrated in Sub-Saharan Africa, where the external debt has risen from $3 billion in 1962 to $250 billion. And the rise in debt has been accompanied by a series of conferences, initiatives and plans, all accompanied by claims that, this time, real measures had been taken to resolve the problem. The Cologne Summit is no exception. US hailed the latest agreement as “a historic step tohelp the world’s poorest nations achieve sustained growth and independence”. British Prime Minister Tony Blair, never one to be outdone in humanitarian rhetoric, said the summit “will probably mark the biggest step forward in debt relief and help to the poorest countries that we have seen in the international community for many years”. Critics point out that poor counbtries will be faced with imposing even harsher measures under the IMF’s “structural adjustment programme” in order to qualify for debt relief. Such measures include ending government subsidies, increased privatization, deregulation of the economy and currency devaluations. As the details of the plan were being released last week, Oxfam pointed out that even after the proposed reforms, HIPC states would still be spending more than one-fifth of their revenues on debt servicing. Another aspect of the plan to come under fire is the proposal for the IMF to sell part of its gold stocks in order to finance debt relief. The World Gold Council, a London-based organisation of gold mining companies, claimed that the recent fall in the price of tgold was a result of plans by the IMF. The UK and Switerzland had to sell off stock that had costed HIPC countries more than $150 million in export earnings. “The future growth of these nations is being undermined by precisely those who wish to proffer a helping hand — the IMF and governments of some well developed cousntries”, it said.


  1. According to the passage the promised debt relief announced at the G-7 summit

    • will be a major step towards alleviating the debt burden of developing countries

    • is a huge outlay and would cost the G-7 nations high

    • is not quite so attractive for the debtor nations if one looks at the detailed plan

    • is a major breakthrough

  2. The yawning gap between rhetoric and reality refers to the gap between

    • the declaration and the implementation

    • the myth and the reality

    • the interest burden pre and post relief package

    • the size of the proclaimed relief package and the relief actually resulting

  3. The primary health budget of Mozambique, according to the passage is about

    • $80 million

    • $40 million

    • $20 million

    • $10 million

  4. The debt relief promised to the poorest countries is likely to be counter productive as

    • countries will still be spending more than 20% of their total revenue on debt servicing

    • countries may have to sell part of their gold reserves to finance debt relief

    • countries will have to undergo structural adjustment programmes which may impose further hardship on their people

    • Both (1) and (3) above


  1. According to the passage, the future growth of the HIPC countries

    • is likely to be accelerated by the sell-off of gold stocks by the developed countries

    • is likely to remain the same as a result of these reform measures

    • is being hampered by the International Monetary Fund

    • All of the above

  2. The phrase “the devil is in the detail” used in the passage means

    • debt is a big evil

    • the full meaning dawns when you read the fine print, all of it

    • the plan has too many details which hamper understanding

    • whatever way you look, the detailed analysis of the debt burden hits you

  3. The HIPC debt relief plan

    • reduced HIPC debts to manageable levels

    • gave an opportunity to bring down the debt crisis

    • bound the counrtries even more into higher debt commitment

    • made developed countries even more tense about HIPC debts

1   2   3   4   5   6   Next >>

Home History Ignou Courses Regional Centers Notification Disccussion Form Special Features Contact Us

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. COPYRIGHT © N F I L    Legal Disclaimer