Directions : For Q. Nos. 31 to 45. Given below are two passages (I and II) followed by the questions based on the contents of
the passages. Answer the questions based on the contents of the passage. |
PASSAGE 1
|
         The headlines proclaimed billions of dollars of debt relief for the world’s poorest countries as a result of the decisions
taken by the major industrial countries at their annual G-7 summit, held in Cologne. But as the saying goes, the devil is in the
detail. And closer examination of the debt write-off plan reveals a yawning gap between rhetoric and reality. The G-7 has
proposed to reduce the debt of the poorest nations by $27 billion. But critics point out that much of the debt written off was not
being serviced in any case. Even with the latest relief, poor countries will still be paying more interest and other payments to
the banks and global financial institutions than they spend on education and health. Experience shows that extreme caution
should be exercised when considering official pronouncements on debt relief plans. Three years ago the so-called Highly
Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) debt reduction initiative was greeted with similar headlines. World Bank president James
Wolfensohn hailed it as a “breakthrough”. US Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin said debt would be reduced to “manageable
levels” and poor countries would be placed “on a sound footing for future development and growth”. Even the aid agency,
Oxfam called it a “real opportunity to bring down the curtain on the debt crisis”. But the HIPC plan left the poorest nations
deeper in debt and more tightly entrapped in the coils of the international financial system. This year, four million children
under the age of five in the 41 nations classified as HIPCs will die as a result of preventable diseases, mainly due to lack of
clean water and sanitation. Around 50 million children of primary school age are not in school, two-thirds of them girls. After
carrying out stringent International Monetary Fund (IMF) restructuring measures, based on cutting government spending and
opening up its economy to the operations of the “free market”, Mozambique, one of the poorest nations in the world, qualified
for debt relief under the HIPC programme. It cut just $10 million from its debt burden and will still spend $80 million a year
on debt — more than twice the national budget for primary education and four times the budget for primary health. |
         The HIPC countries are concentrated in Sub-Saharan Africa, where the external debt has risen from $3 billion in 1962
to $250 billion. And the rise in debt has been accompanied by a series of conferences, initiatives and plans, all accompanied
by claims that, this time, real measures had been taken to resolve the problem. The Cologne Summit is no exception. US hailed
the latest agreement as “a historic step tohelp the world’s poorest nations achieve sustained growth and independence”. British
Prime Minister Tony Blair, never one to be outdone in humanitarian rhetoric, said the summit “will probably mark the biggest
step forward in debt relief and help to the poorest countries that we have seen in the international community for many years”.
Critics point out that poor counbtries will be faced with imposing even harsher measures under the IMF’s “structural adjustment
programme” in order to qualify for debt relief. Such measures include ending government subsidies, increased privatization, deregulation of the economy and currency devaluations. As the details of the plan were being released last week, Oxfam pointed out that even after the proposed reforms, HIPC states would still be spending more than one-fifth of their revenues on debt servicing. Another aspect of the plan to come under fire is the proposal for the IMF to sell part of its gold stocks in order to finance debt relief. The World Gold Council, a London-based organisation of gold mining companies, claimed that the recent fall in the price of tgold was a result of plans by the IMF. The UK and Switerzland had to sell off stock that had costed HIPC countries more than $150 million in export earnings. “The future growth of these nations is being undermined by precisely those who wish to proffer a helping hand — the IMF and governments of some well developed cousntries”, it said.
|
According to the passage the promised debt relief announced at the G-7 summit
will be a major step towards alleviating the debt burden of developing countries
is a huge outlay and would cost the G-7 nations high
is not quite so attractive for the debtor nations if one looks at the detailed plan
is a major breakthrough
The yawning gap between rhetoric and reality refers to the gap between
the declaration and the implementation
the myth and the reality
the interest burden pre and post relief package
the size of the proclaimed relief package and the relief actually resulting
The primary health budget of Mozambique, according to the passage is about
$80 million
$40 million
$20 million
$10 million
The debt relief promised to the poorest countries is likely to be counter productive as
countries will still be spending more than 20% of their total revenue on debt servicing
countries may have to sell part of their gold reserves to finance debt relief
countries will have to undergo structural adjustment programmes which may impose further hardship on their people
Both (1) and (3) above
|
According to the passage, the future growth of the HIPC countries
is likely to be accelerated by the sell-off of gold stocks by the developed countries
is likely to remain the same as a result of these reform measures
is being hampered by the International Monetary Fund
All of the above
The phrase “the devil is in the detail” used in the passage means
debt is a big evil
the full meaning dawns when you read the fine print, all of it
the plan has too many details which hamper understanding
whatever way you look, the detailed analysis of the debt burden hits you
The HIPC debt relief plan
reduced HIPC debts to manageable levels
gave an opportunity to bring down the debt crisis
bound the counrtries even more into higher debt commitment
made developed countries even more tense about HIPC debts
|
|
|